Home › Island News › Local News
Construction staging, street lights back on Marco agenda
Plus an issue that has dogged the council for quite some time
STORY TOOLS
RELATED STORIES
- Night light fight: Street light installation stalled on Marco amid questions of funding
- Marco Island looks at allowing canines back into city parks
More Local News
- Alternative revenue sources may be answer to Marco's property tax shortfall
- Vacation for procreation returns to Marco Island
- Marco's Code Board gives stiff fines for repeat offenders
Share and Enjoy [?]
Monday’s City Council meeting might seem like a re-run. All of the topics up for discussion will sound familiar, but that is because they have either been long put off from other meetings or requested by the council as future agenda items.
As part of the consent agenda, Council is expected to give the go-ahead to execute a contract with Steven Thompson to become the city’s next manager. He was picked as the top candidate in a special-called meeting Tuesday after a two-day interview process.
Council is also expected to discuss options for lift station construction staging, a long-vetted topic from the last regular council meeting held April 7. Council received a presentation from Public Works Director Rony Joel at the time that highlighted three options, all of which Joel warned had specific pitfalls.
Staging for lift station construction, a two-year project, requires several lots for storage of both equipment and fill dirt. Joel told council they could elect to operate the construction out of vacant rented lots, out of city land set aside for the future Veterans’ Community Park or out of the city’s south water treatment plant, tucked between Mackle Park and a residential neighborhood.
Unsatisfied with any of the options, council asked Joel to look into the costs of staging the construction off-island. Placing the operations on the island could cost as little as $30, per new sewer customer, or as much as $80, according to Joel, based on the option chosen by council. He warned that using off-island land could be significantly more expensive, and the residents of upcoming sewer districts would absorb the costs.
On Monday, council will discuss the range of options researched by Joel since the last meeting. The Eagle was unable to obtain materials on those options because the full agenda packet was not ready by deadline on Thursday.
Council is also expected to discuss installation of street lights on South Collier Boulevard, though the item was initially to put off until council budget workshops beginning in May. At a Feb. 19 meeting, council was originally asked to approve a $319,000 contract for the electrical design and installation of the specially-ordered lights through funds from the five percent electric franchise fee.
The expenditure was originally approved by council in May 2007, but the current council asked at the February meeting to put the item off, citing concerns about continued use of the franchise fee to fund street light installation.
But the street lights matching those along the rest of Collier Boulevard have been delivered and are in storage. A funding crunch led council to put off the installation until budget talks could paint a broader picture of the city’s overall monetary state.
An April 4 email from interim City Manager Dana Souza to the council outlined possible alternative funding sources.
City attorneys recently recouped money from a two-year-old $228,000 bond where the contractor did not perform the contracted work. Roughly $28,000 from the fight will have to cover attorney’s fees, Attorney Alan Gabriel said, leaving the city $200,000.
In an email by Joel, forwarded to the council by Souza, Joel suggests using that recovered money from the Collier Creek Dredging Bond to fund the street light installation.
“I would like to have council ... consider the transfer of $95,000 to complete the construction of the street lights along S. Collier Boulevard between Winterberry Drive and Collier Court rather than at the May 19, 2008 work shop,” Joel wrote. “The installation of the lights were planned in conjunction with the reuse line extension (currently underway), and new funding has become available that did not exist when this was last discussed by council.”
Joel also stated in the email that the current depth of Collier Creek is adequate, and the $31,000 left over from the project could be added to the amount recovered from the bond.
He suggested in the email three options to fund the street lights: using funds from the Construction Contingency Fund, totaling more than $1.6 million, mostly for Collier Boulevard Construction; using the bond refund; using a $95,000 South Florida Water Management grant abandoned by another city and given to Marco; or a combination of those options.
Joel confirmed on Thursday that he still planned to present those funding sources as possible options.
Council will also discuss a long-awaited item on how to make the island more dog-friendly. Past discussions will be aired out, including a 2006 discussion of a Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee report on the feasibility of an off-leash dog park. Council decided not to move forward with the project at the time.
Councilor Ted Forcht alluded to those talks during a March 17 meeting when council asked that the topic be placed on a future agenda.
“It was brought up two years ago and it went down in flames hard,” he said.
At the very least, council is expected to discuss the possibility of allowing leashed dogs into city parks, with some restrictions, including the length of the leash, prohibitions on areas such as playgrounds and requirements to pick up pet waste.
City Public Information Coordinator Lisa Douglass said council will likely examine another proposal drafted by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee from 2004 that addressed that dilemma, plus look at current rules regarding dogs on Naples city park property.
Finally, council’s first business item is a familiar one, but one not yet approached by the new city council. It is a request for a conditional use permit to add three condos to a commercial property at 23 Front Street.
Council members sworn in just a month ago fielded many questions during their campaigns about their approaches to mixed use development. Monday’s meeting will be the first litmus test of just how tolerant the council is as a whole regarding mixed use conditional permits.
The property, home of 4,100 square feet of retail space inhabited by Island Bike Shop, is owned by Matt Walthour. The request was originally aired before the city’s Planning Board April 4 and approved unanimously.
Marco Island City Council meets at 5:30 Monday in the community room of the Marco Island Police Department building, located at 51 Bald Eagle Drive.

Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
The possibility of extending the South Water Plant into Mackle Park was mentioned at April 7th meeting by two councilors.
Currently a portion of the park is occupied by the Public Works Department in violation of the deed restrictions and since violations are ignored by most Marco citizens additional intrusion can be expected to be met with little objection.
See http://www.34145.com/Park/Deed1.jpg
Mr. Joel had no objection to converting a portion of the park from Worthington to Heathwood into a staging area. (see Council video Item 5-E, @ 43:00 and 56:00). Also mentioned was an extension to Lily Ct into the park toward Worthington St.
A portion of the park is occupied by the Public Works Department in violation of the deed restrictions and since violations are ignored by most Marco citizens additional intrusion can be expected to be met with little objection.
April 7th Mr. Waldack submitted results of his investigation of the Sullivan/Mackle Park neighborhood. "It was quiet out there. It was boring," Waldack said.
Witnesses confirm Mr. Waldack’s finding described as boring quietness in the Sullivan neighborhood on the same days as his investigation.
Mr. Waldack and the council voted to destroy Sullivan’s boring, quiet neighborhood unanimously and the destruction began at sunrise the next morning, April 8th. Mission Accomplished.
Although ignored by NDN additional objections to vibration (that cracked a home foundation), noise and air pollution, traffic congestion and a danger to families with children entering the park at Lily Ct were presented. (See council video Item 7-B @ 102:00)
Since it appears the Sullivan and South Mackle Park area neighborhoods have been condemned to be polluted and the pollution can be contained within that area alternative sites should not be considered.
Staging areas in Mackle Park and Sullivan neighborhoods are logical locations for additional pollution and danger.
Sullivan and the other families are in the way. If they cannot accept pollution and illegal activities they should leave the area immediately to protect their families or just bend over, lube up and enjoy it.
Ben Powell
399 Heathwood Drag
Marco Island, Florida 34145
239-394-2499
#1 Posted by Motu on April 18, 2008 at 3:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The city poked Sullivan in the brown eye at 9:AM this morning.
Recently the City Council approved a “conditional use” permit weeks after the property was already “in use” in Sullivan’s boring and quiet neighborhood.
It appeared obvious that the decision to allow the CUP was made before Sullivan was given his chance to voice his concern for his family’s safety.
Tonight the Council will “make believe” another decision before Sullivan has his chance to voice concern for safety of his family and neighborhood.
It appears, according to this NDN article, council will discuss and decide whether to allow Mike Sullivan’s back yard to also become a “staging area”.
Hemorrhoid staging in Sullivan’s neighborhood was extremely active at 9:AM this morning, hours before the council has even met openly to allow anyone to voice their concern.
COMING SOON:
The City Council should make another “make believe” decision that will approve the continued illegal Public Works operation on Mackle Park property in violation of the deed restrictions. http://www.34145.com/Park/Deed1.jpg
These peace molesters have operated in Mackle Park for quite a while.
The Mackle Brothers should agree that all island residents will get raped for that decision. Read the Deed…
Adjacent Mackle Park property owners have fallen asleep in their quiet boring neighborhood. No doubt, Sullivan’s brown eye pain will be felt by others.
No need to attend the “staged” council meeting tonight, the decision has already been made.
Lube up Sullivan, the forecast calls for pain.
Ben Powell
399 Heathwood Drag
Marco Island, Florida 34145
239-394-2499
#2 Posted by Motu on April 21, 2008 at 3:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ben Powell, I watched the council meeting "live" in disbelief when you addressed council. Are you dense?? Did you watch the meeting rerun?? Several councilors tried, in vain, to explain to the situation at the South Plant but either you did not hear or did not want to accept what they said. You live next to city owned property and the council seemed very concerned about your feelings and the feelings of other affected residents but you didn't get what you wanted so you countinue to act like a complete baby! Grow up already, you and Sullivan bought the property at a lower price becasue it was next to a utility...now live with it! Just when we get rid of Foster, Davies, Hall and the rest of trouble makers you and Sullivan show up and start all over again. This community has had enough of the BS. What makes you so self-important to think anyone cares what you think? My advice to you is MOVE!!!!!!!
#3 Posted by 27_Year_Resident on April 21, 2008 at 4:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
27_Beer_Residue,
Nice to hear from you again.
You're right, as you know, I live next to a city owned park and this council is concerned for a good reason.
They run an illegal operation in Mackle Park.
The deed to the park passed from the county to the city with restrictions.
A suggestion that the County Commission be petitioned to retake control of the park and return it to the citizens will be embarrassing.
You don't seem to care that the city sticks Sullivan's brown eye. He must enjoy it or he'd move.
Stay off the pills and when you're able to focus, watch the video to see your acting City Manager and Parks Director get surprised that there was a dump located in his park. You might also see Waldack give his locally famous eye-witness "peaceful boring" investigative report.
Move!!!! Yup! Move out of our park.
Cupcake 27, have a few Old Immokalee beers and stop back by to see me again.
I'm all outta gum.
Ben Powell
399 Heathwood Drag
Marco Island Florida 34145
239-394-2499
#4 Posted by Motu on April 21, 2008 at 8:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
How much do you want for your house Ben?
#5 Posted by MarcoAvenger on April 22, 2008 at 3:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The Sullivan/Mackle Park polution was first discovered by former senior investigative writer Ed Bania. We recommend that everyone read it.
Resident angered by city plant
By Ed Bania
Originally published 04:02 p.m., March 22, 2007
Updated 11:35 p.m., March 25, 2007
#6 Posted by bankerguynaples on April 23, 2008 at 12:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)