Home › Island Views › Editorials
Editorial: The election’s over — Let the healing begin
STORY TOOLS
Related Links
More Editorials
- Guest commentary: Islanders input needed on fast-moving Marco issues
- Editorial: Don’t hit and run; owe your outrage
- Editorial: Time after time
Share and Enjoy [?]
Marco voters finally had their say on the sewer project and it appears they want it to continue.
This newspaper spent the better part of 2007 on coverage leading up to this election. We watched as candidate after candidate stepped forward, until we had a slate of four candidates in favor of continuing this project, and four who wanted it stopped.
We listened as the cries became louder and the contempt more unpalatable. Facts seemed hard to come by as every number presented from one side was challenged with an equally provocative number from the opposition. But the one point that even rose above the coughs from hydrogen sulfide gas was the fact that voters had never had their say. Well, now they have.
Voters gave a thumbs up to all four pro-sewer candidates, even surprising me a little. Odds were that we would have found ourselves with a mixed bag. So in true American fashion, now is the time for us to unite. The fighting and division must stop. But it’s up to the losers as much as the winners to help the healing begin.
I think we forget sometimes that we can love and respect those who hold a different view than our own. We do it all of the time with our families. And that’s what this community really is — an extended family. It’s time we extend that unconditional love to our friends and neighbors.
I met some dedicated people on both sides of this issue. Yes, there was a handful of nasty, negative people — on both sides — who fueled the flames. In the end, we all wanted what was best for our island and for our families. You can’t hate anyone for that.
My wish for 2008 is that the citizens of Marco Island work with this new council and, while we may disagree from time to time, we do it with respect and dignity. Let us prove that a few nasty, negative individuals won’t set the tone for our debate. Let’s pledge to disagree with grace.
If we don’t, then we will be the destroyers of Paradise.
* * *
Marco staffers Leslie Williams, Vonna Keomanyvong, Quentin Roux and Roger LaLonde along with Naple’s Daily News writer Liam Dillon and photographer Michelle Le spent election day canvassing the island.
Williams and Dillon provided exit polls throughout the day on marconews.com. Roux, LaLonde, and Le posted galleries leading up to and including the victory celebrations. Keomanyvong shot video and posted continuous updates to marconews.com. I want to thank them, and you, for making The Eagle your source for election coverage.
Thanks to your efforts, marconews.com surged with an over 50 percent increase in traffic.
I also want to thank all my coworkers, out in front and behind the scenes, who took time away from their families so that we could extend our deadline until 10 p.m. It gave us the opportunity to deliver the election results in print the next morning. It was exhilarating and gratifying to deliver the news directly to reader’s computers within minutes and to their doorstep within hours.

Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
Some final analysis of the election by Precinct
Overall 72% of the registered voters (8,916) cast ballots. This was the highest turnout ever (the 1997 city-hood election had a 71% turnout). The average ballot voted for 3.8 candidates.
By Precincts:
Precinct 190 (First Presbyterian) - 66% voted. This area consists of all sewered homes and the recently constructed North Marco sewer district. The pro-sewer candidates received 67% of the vote.
Precinct 191 (St Marks) - 77% voted. This area consists of Hideaway Beach, the recently connected Tigertail sewer district and the 2009 Kendall district. The pro-sewer candidates received 69% of the vote.
Precinct 192 (Mackle Park)- 60% voted. This area consists of about half sewered homes and the 2010 Gulfport and 2011 Goldenrod sewer districts. The pro-sewer candidates received 52% of the vote.
Precinct 193 (United Church) - 72% voted. This area consists of about half sewered or recently constructed sewer homes and the 2012 Estates and 2008 Sheffield sewer districts. The pro-sewer candidates received 52% of the vote.
Precinct 194 (Marco Lutheran) - 76% voted. This area consists of condos and mostly homes in the 2008 Lamplighter and 2011 Copperfield sewer districts. The pro-sewer candidates received 58% of the vote.
Precinct 195 (Jewish Congregation Temple) - 79% voted. This area consists of condos and single family homes with recently constructed sewers. The pro-sewer candidates received 75% of the vote.
Precinct 196 (Mackle Park) - 71% voted. This area consists of about 20% homes on sewer and 80% in the 2010 East Winterberry and 2009 Mackle Park sewer districts. The pro-sewer candidates received 44% of the votes - this is the only district the pro-sewer candidates failed to win.
#1 Posted by d_a_t_a_m_a_n on February 1, 2008 at 10:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sure wish your paper had thought of doing some real in depth interviews of ALL the candidates. I realize you made an attempt in the beginning of the campaign to do so as an introduction. That said, you missed some great opportunities to build on those interviews by following up with the candidates once they made their campaign promises. There were several stories out there that I wish you had researched and questioned the candidates about, claims of rate increases and promises to bring re-use water to the residential neighborhoods, etc. In depth examination of those stories would have made us a little more infomred prior to our going to the polls.
#2 Posted by Fossil on February 3, 2008 at 6:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Fossil, it looks like the voters were very informed. History shows us that large turn outs with landslide victorys mean that the voters are engaged. If you feel different you are probably not happy with the results. That is the double edged sword of Democracy!
#3 Posted by ejburger on February 4, 2008 at 12:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
ej, how do you equate a large turnout with voters being very well informed? I recall two presidential elections in which an empty suit was elected not just once but twice! How informed were those voters?
#4 Posted by Lolala on February 5, 2008 at 7:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)