Login | Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map | Archives | RSS | Subscribe to the paper

HomeIsland NewsLocal News

Marco Island releases list of 15 candidates for city manager

City of Marco Island City Manager Candidates

Frank M. Bell, Town Manager, Telluride, Colo.

Michael Copp, City Manager, Sheridan, Colo.

Donald D. Crawford, City Manager, Hamtramck, Mich.

Richard M. Finn, Former City Manager, Takoma Park, Md.

John F. Fischbach, County Administrator, Jefferson County, Wash.

Steve Garman, City Manager, Decatur, Ill.

Richard Gestrich, Township Manager, Middletown Township, Penn.

James D. Hock, City Manager, Oak Park, Mich.

Mark R. Lauzier, Senior Manager, Matrix Consluting Group, Coral Springs, Fla.

James J. Malloy, Town Administrator, Sturbridge, Mass.

Jeffrey B. Muzzy, Program Director, World Bank Local Economic Development Project- Lebanon

Ed Sadler, City Manager, City of Webster City, Iowa

Michael L. Stampfler, Owner/Managing Partner CivicQuest Consulting, Portage, Mich.

Dale S. Sugerman, Town Manager, Highland Beach, Fla.

Steven T. Thompson, Former City Manager, Deltona, Fla.

STORY TOOLS
Share on Facebook

The city of Marco Island released its list of 15 candidates for the position of city manager late Friday afternoon, reversing a decision made earlier in the week to keep the information private.

Of the 15 candidates, just one is a current public administrator in Florida, Dale S. Sugerman, the town manager of Highland Beach on the state’s east coast. Twelve of the candidates work out of state, and of the remaining two candidates, one works in Florida’s private sector and the other was most recently employed as a city manager in the state. Also, only one of the 15 candidates, Michael L. Stampfler, was among 61 applicants for the Naples city manager position when it was open in the fall. Stampfler did not make Naples’s list of 10 finalists.

Naples hired former Marco Island City Manager Bill Moss, who was the only manager in the city’s 10-year history. Former Clearwater City Manager Tony Shoemaker has held Marco’s job on an interim basis since November. Shoemaker is not on the list of candidates for the permanent position.

The list of 15 was narrowed from 74 applicants by Tom Freijo, a senior vice president at Winter Haven-based The Mercer Group, the city’s consulting firm in the search. Freijo also advised Naples in its city manager selection.

Freijo is scheduled to present the candidates to City Council during Monday’s regularly scheduled meeting. It will be the first meeting for three newly-elected councilors: Jerry Gibson, Frank Recker and Wayne Waldack.

The names of the 15 candidates were not easy to come by as the city had maintained it wanted to keep the list private and only in the hands of the four current councilors and the three council-elects until Monday.

Shoemaker e-mailed the four current councilors and the three new members Thursday morning stating they would receive the 15 resumes on Friday in a sealed envelope from Freijo addressed directly to them.

The reason for not sending the resumes sooner, Shoemaker wrote, “is an attempt to provide some protection to the candidates that make the first cut of 12 to 18 but do not make the final cut of 6 to 8. It has happened in other communities that when the resumes are released earlier that individuals have made phone calls to the candidates home community. This exposes the candidates to unwanted attention even though they are not a finalist.”

The Daily News made a request for the 15 resumes on Friday afternoon and Shoemaker told a reporter that the seven sealed envelopes had left city hall around 2 p.m., and the city had not kept a copy of the records.

When asked whether the city was claiming an exemption from Florida’s public records law by not making them available on Friday, Shoemaker said the city wasn’t. He added the public records law allowed the city to have “a reasonable amount of time” to provide records and the city would be making them available on Monday. But he referred to his e-mail when asked whether the applicants’ privacy concerns were the reason why the city chose its distribution method for the resumes.

“I don’t think it’s unusual to ask that the council review it before it’s made public,” Shoemaker said.

Adria Harper, a director with the First Amendment Foundation, a media-funded state open records organization, said although candidates’ desire for privacy when applying for a job is understandable, it’s not one of the exemptions listed from the state’s public records law.

“It’s not the worst thing I’ve ever heard of given that they’re going to release them a couple days later,” Harper said. “Still, public records law does not allow agencies to withhold information without a specific exemption.”

“If you’re applying for a public position in Florida, your information is going to be public,” she added.

After speaking with Shoemaker, the Daily News contacted Councilman Bill Trotter, who went to Marco’s city hall and made a copy of the resumes for city records. The city then provided the resumes to various local media outlets, including the Daily News.

Even though Freijo, the city’s search consultant, had hoped to cut in half the list of 15 candidates during Monday night’s meeting, some councilors are already frustrated with the selection process.

Council-elect Frank Recker replied to Shoemaker’s Thursday e-mail, asking the city to hold off on reducing the number of candidates until council has more time to review the list. Recker also suggested each of the city manager candidates prepare a brief video presentation to explain why they are the best person for the job. Council could see those videos at a special meeting called as soon as March 24, he wrote.

“I don’t think it’s reasonable for me to go from 15 down to six in a period of one hour,” Recker said in a telephone interview Friday. “I’d feel rushed if I get something that’s so important to the future of the city on a Friday, have to look at it over the weekend and then make decisions during my first council meeting. I’m not ready to do that.”

Incumbent Councilman Rob Popoff echoed the sentiments expressed in Recker’s e-mail in a separate interview Friday. Popoff said he would make a request to delay the selection process if Recker himself didn’t do it.

“To do this without any lead time is ridiculous,” Popoff said. “I will move so that it doesn’t happen.”

Comments

This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.


Thank goodness for Mr Recker pointing out that City Council Members should not be rushed into decisions on a few days notice. Also thank goodness for Mr Trotter making a copy for City Hall and making them available to the media in accordance with Law. This is not the first time that City Hall has claimed that they did not retain a copy of something. The old policy of delivering hundreds of pages of material to Council Members for their review and decision on a few days notice should be stopped immediately. Maybe all materials [ except for emergency items ] should be provived two weeks before the public meeting with a work session meeting a week before the public meeting to insure careful informed decisions after discussing all options and the advantage or disadvantage of each option. Staff recommendations should receive proper detailed consideration of all Council Members and not receive automatic and immediate action on only a couple days notice as in the past.

Posted by SmokeyJoe on March 15, 2008 at 8:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Why do we need a City Council? Just let the Editors of the Paper run this mess of a City, they are more than qualified,,,look at the great job they have done with the Eagle!
I for one don't want my Councilmen going into a meeting with good information and having an opportunity to talk to the citizens before they vote.
H*ll the only one on that Council to ever ask my opinion is Forcht and he's out voted most of the time!

Posted by OldMarcoMan on March 15, 2008 at 11:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)

OldMarcoMan, I guess all councilors should confer with you before making any decisions. It's not our city councilors job to hunt you down and ask your opinion. I voted for a council that will make the decisions, not a councilor that just tries to make an angry mob happy. Kiester and Forcht have just played to the loud mouths. They are merely puppets for the losers. I am very pleased with the tough councilors able to make the difficult decisions without your unsolicited opinions.

Posted by MarcoFacts on March 15, 2008 at 10:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)

MarcoFacts, don't be disappointed with Coucilman Recter. I recall hearing Coucilman Recter state clearly that he intended to listen to our citizens and that he felt it his responsibility to hear them out. I never heard him qualify that promise by saying he would only listen to "solicited opinions". Keep the following in mind when you consider how you want to be governed: "Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." - Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776

Posted by Beowulf on March 16, 2008 at 8:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)

MarcoFacts:

On what basis do you wish the council to make those decisions? Strictly on the basis of staff recommendations? What need have we for a council if they just rubber-stamp staff recommendations? And how much time do you want them to have to make decisions that have long-term consequences? An hour? Apparently you are uneasy with a government "of the people, by the people and for the people." Why is that?

Ed Foster

Posted by EdFoster on March 16, 2008 at 8:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Marcofacts, as I recall, the 9th German federal election of the Weimar Republic was held on March 5, 1933, and was the last election to be held in Germany before World War II. Because of the success of the Nazi Party in the poll, its leader and Chancellor of Germany, Adolf Hitler, was able to pass the Enabling Act, which effectively gave him the power of a dictator. The Chancellor made ALL decisions himself, he never sought out the opinion of others nor did he listen to or fear the mob. He never questioned the wisdom of the state because he was the state. He always did what HE alone believed was right for the German people. Is that the type of leadership that you voted for?

Posted by Fossil on March 16, 2008 at 12:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Come on folks, why don,t we just try to get the new council to listen to areas of concern about current operations that could stand improvement. I hope the council chooses to ask for input from the residents of our Island Paradise on changes that will truly benefit everyone. I don,t know if the council members read these comments in the press but I hope they do because I for sure would like to point out certain problems that really need correcting.

Posted by SmokeyJoe on March 20, 2008 at 8:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)



Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn: